10 Myths and Realities
Myth #1 Economic
sanctions have produced temporary hardship for the Iraqi people, but are an
effective, nonviolent method of containing Iraq.
While estimates and overall
statistics vary, few independent authorities will protest the fact that at
least 500,000 Iraqi children have died since 1990 as a direct result of the
economic sanctions. More humans have died from sanctions than died from the
atomic bombing of Hiroshima and the civil war in Bosnia. A September 1999
UNICEF report confirmed this number of excess deaths, finding that infant
mortality rates in Iraq have more than doubled since the imposition of
sanctions. The 1998 UNICEF report found that over 5,000 children die each month
for lack of adequate food and medicine. Former UN Humanitarian Coordinator for
Iraq and Assistant Secretary General Denis Halliday called this statistic
“conservative.”
Economic sanctions against Iraq are
costly from an American perspective (in the range of $1 billion per year), and
deadly from an Iraqi perspective. They target the most vulnerable members of
the Iraqi society -- the poor, elderly, new born, sick and young -- in such a
way that many consider economic sanctions more lethal than violence and more
punishing than war. Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire referred to sanctions
on Iraq as “the economic nuclear bomb.” The economic sanctions, coupled with
the pain inflicted by US military attacks, have reduced Iraq’s infrastructure
and economy to virtual rubble; oxygen factories, water sanitation plants, and
hospitals stand useless, their lifesaving powers denied. Surveys by UN agencies
and independent NGOs continue to report tragic and precipitous declines in
health and nutrition throughout Iraq.
The UN Department of Humanitarian
Affairs has found that “public health services are near total collapse -- basic
medicines, life-saving drugs and essential medical supplies are lacking
throughout the country. Fifty per cent of rural people have no access to
potable water and waster water treatment facilities have stopped functioning in
most urban areas.”
Before the Gulf War, Iraq had the
best health care system in the Middle East, and one of the best educational
programs in the world. Its health indicators were comparable to many western
European nations. Iraq is today one of the most malnourished, impoverished, and
underfed nations, although it sits on the second largest oil reserve in the
world.
Myth #2 Iraq
possesses, and seeks to build, weapons of mass destruction. If unchecked, and
without economic sanctions, Iraq will threaten its neighbors.
According to former UNSCOM Chief
Inspector, W. Scott Ritter, Iraq has been “qualitatively disarmed.” Mr. Ritter
explains that Iraq does not currently possess the capability to use, launch, or
deploy chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons. The UNSCOM teams were
incredibly effective at reducing Iraq’s arsenal. According to UNSCOM
Chairperson Richard Butler, if disarming Iraq were considered a five-lap race,
“Iraq would be three quarters of the way around the fifth and final lap.”
Tragic irony and faulty logic
sustain the embargo. The United States bombs Iraq and maintains economic
sanctions, which have destroyed more human life than all weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq combined, because Iraq “has not complied with UN
resolutions.” The sanctions are more lethal and illegal than any failure of the
Iraqi regime to comply with inspectors. Moreover, there is no way for Iraq to fully comply unless the United States
ceases to arm Iraq’s neighbors, who have the ability to threaten its borders.
The United States supplied Iraq with
most of its weapons. Just two days before Iraq invaded Kuwait, then-President
George Bush approved and signed a shipment of military supplies to Iraq. The
United States and Britain were the major suppliers of chemical and biological
weapons to Iraq in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq War, in which the United
States supported both sides with weapons sales. A report from the US Senate
Committee on Bank, Housing, and Urban Affairs found that 9 out of 10 biological
materials used in Iraq’s weapons components were bought from US companies.
Finally, the United States
possesses, and keeps on hair-trigger alert, more nuclear weapons than any other
nation in the world. US Congress has failed to ratify the Test-Ban Treaty. Many
Iraqis feel that it is disingenuous of the United States -- sitting atop the
world’s largest nuclear arsenal, refusing to allow its weapons sites to be
inspected by international experts, and being the only nation in the world ever
to drop an atomic bomb -- to tell Iraq what it can and cannot produce.
Myth #3 Iraq has
acted in violation of UN resolutions, while the United States has not.
UN Resolution 687, article 14, calls
for regional disarmament as the basis for reducing Iraq’s arsenal. By arming
Iraq’s neighbors in the Middle East, the US is contravening the same UN
resolution with which it maintains the economic sanctions. The US acts
hypocritically, asking that the UN maintain economic sanctions, while bombing
unilaterally and refusing to pay its UN dues.
While the United States claims to be
pacifying the Middle East by stemming Iraq’s arsenal, it continues to arm
Iraq’s neighbors at a rapacious pace. Some of the consumers of American
military technology -- in the Middle East and elsewhere -- read like a “whose
who” of international terrorists, human rights violators, and dictators. The US
supplies Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Syria with weapons and
technology, all of who are Iraq’s neighbors and could potentially threaten
Iraq’s borders. 87 per cent of the weapons used by the Indonesian military in
the repression of East Timorese were sold by the US military or US weapons’
contractors.
Myth #4 The Iraqi
government has constantly weakened and undermined the UN weapons inspection
program, in part by kicking out inspectors in December 1998 and causing
“Operation Desert Fox.”
The Iraqi regime, knowing that the United States
favors Saddam Hussein's ouster and will impose sanctions until a regime change,
has no incentive to cooperate with the United States or intrusive inspections. Two secretaries of state under President Clinton --
Madeleine Albright and Warren Christopher -- have publicly stated that
sanctions will remain intact until Saddam Hussein is driven from power. The
Iraq Liberation Act has budgeted $97 million toward this end.
Richard Butler removed inspectors
from Iraq, prior to the December 1998 bombardment of Iraq, contrary to recent
reports of the US State Department. According to Butler’s own records, his team
of weapons inspectors made numerous unimpeded visits the week before the
December bombing. On only a few visits was he prevented from inspecting a site.
Numerous revelations, confirmed by
Butler, indicate that he was in frequent communication with the US military the
week before the bombing, making increasingly strident statements about the
supposed intransigence of the Iraqi regime. The US government admitted, after
an embarrassing Washington Post story, that it had been using UNSCOM to spy on
Iraq.
Myth #5 The Iraqi
government is deliberately withholding and stockpiling food and medicine, to
exacerbate the human suffering for political sympathy and to draw attention to
the need to lift sanctions.
In its September 1999 Report, the US
State Department alleged that Iraq is warehousing and stockpiling medicine with
malicious intent. The warehousing of medicines is heavily monitored by the UN
and is acknowledged by local UN administration and staff to be caused by
logistical problems stemming from nine years of sanctions and lingering Gulf
War damage. UN officials in Iraq call this allegation “a myth that needs
debunking.”
The United Nations conducts frequent itemization of
the food and medicine that is stored in Iraq. Dr. Popol, Acting Director of the
WHO in Iraq, and Hans Von Sponeck, have repeatedly called for the
“de-politicization” of distribution, insisting that any stockpiling of medicine
and equipment is the result of Iraq’s abysmal infrastructure.
Iraq must purchase goods multinationally rather than
indigenously. Items come in pieces - dental chairs arrive but compressors must
be ordered from another company, or syringes arrive but needles take longer.
Thus, items must be held in Baghdad until they are complete. This happens, Von Sponeck explained, with
about one-half of the orders. Moreover, the UN 661 Sanctions Committee takes
longer to approve some orders than others, thus forcing Iraq to keep medicine
in storage until complements are approved. Most contracts pertaining to spare
parts -- to rebuild water, sanitation, or electrical facilities -- have been
denied under “dual use” considerations.
Denis Halliday stated on January 12, 1998, that Iraq
would need at least $30 billion to meet its current requirements for food,
medicine, and infrastructure. After allocations are taken out of the oil
revenues to finance Gulf War reparations and UN administrative expenses, the
amount of money, which trickles down to the average person in Iraq is 25 cents
per person per day.
Myth # 6 The Iraqi
leadership uses money -- intended for humanitarian purposes -- to build palaces
and enrich itself.
The New York Times recently noted
that Saddam Hussein “chose to spend what money was available on lavish palaces
and construction projects.” The US State Department used as evidence a new amusement park being
built outside Baghdad, and satellite reconnaissance photographs of a town that
had been razed by Iraqi troops. It was later admitted that the “evidence” was
in fact a photograph of an archaelogical dig, far from the site of the alleged
massacre.
While it is true that Iraq is permitted to sell
approximately $5.2 billion of oil per month, these funds are not at the
discretion of Saddam Hussein, but rather are kept in a UN escrow account, in
the New York branch of the Bank of Paris. Thus, the allegation that Saddam
Hussein diverts humanitarian aid for personal wealth and political power is
near impossible. The United Nations keeps careful accounting of expenditures,
most of which is spent on Gulf War reparations and financing UN programs. The economic sanctions facilitate the black market in Iraq,
strengthening the hegemony of a small and wealthy elite, while targeting the
most vulnerable members of Iraqi society. The upper echelons in Iraq -- those
whom the US seeks to undermine -- are in fact helped by the sanctions, as is
the government, whose grip of power is emboldened by the fact that sanctions
hinder political, social, and educational development. Pluralism and
characteristics of a civil society will flourish only when sanctions are
lifted.
Myth #7 The
distribution in northern Iraq -- where the UN is most heavily involved -- is
better than in the south, proving that the Iraqi government is failing to
adequately distribute food and medicine to its people.
Sanctions are simply not the same in
the north and south. In releasing the recent report, UNICEF's Executive
Director, Carol Bellamy, explained the differences in Iraqi mortality rates as
follows: the Kurdish north has been receiving humanitarian assistance for
longer than the remainder of Iraq, agriculture in the north is better, evading
sanctions is easier (the northern borders being far more porous); the north
receives 22 per cent more per capita from the Oil for Food program than the
center/south, and the north gets about 10 per cent of all UN-controlled
assistance in currency, while the rest of the country receives only
commodities.
UN agency directors and supervisors
who monitor the distribution in the south consider the government distribution
to be “exemplary.” Said Dr. Popol, Acting Director of the WHO, “The Iraqi
government is saving many lives with its distribution mechanism.”
Myth #8 The
international community is united in its opposition to Iraq, and favors
economic sanctions.
France, China, and Russia are three
countries among many, which are united in opposition to the economic sanctions
against Iraq. As permanent members of the UN Security Council, they have
continually challenged the US and UK position on sanctions. The Pope, 53 Bishops,
Denis Halliday, numerous religious leaders, and scores of national institutions
have condemned and protested both sanctions and military strikes. Two Nobel
Peace Laureates, three delegations of physicians, and five congressional
staffpersons have traveled to Iraq this year in violation of sanctions in order
to promote international concern for, and understanding of, the conditions
found in Iraq. The Arab League has called for the immediate lifting of the
economic sanctions. The US is setting a dangerous precedent in the Middle East,
promoting discord and violence, and paving the way for future wars, which will
be fought by the next generation of US citizens. Our children may have to pay
dearly for the mistakes we are making today. Both Halliday and Von Sponeck have
noted a sharp increase in fundamentalism in Iraq, likened by both to the
political marginalization as the Treaty of Versaille began to punish the people
of Germany.
Myth #9 The US and
UK fighter planes patrolling No-fly zones are protecting Iraqi minority groups.
Since the end of the December bombing campaign, there has been zero collateral
damage in these regions.
Since the December bombing campaign against Iraq, US and
UK fighter planes have flown thousands of sorties over the northern and southern
“No-fly zones” to “protect” northern Kurds and southern Shiites. They patrol
the Iraqi air space, they say, so that Iraq cannot attack its own people, as it
did during the 1980s. While UN
resolutions do call for the protection of Iraqi minorities, there is no
stipulation for military enforcement of the zones. Many legal experts have
charged that patrolling these zones is illegal. The US and UK planes have
killed, according to UNOHCI, hundreds of innocent civilians, and injured many
more.
Myth #10 You should
trust the news coverage in respected publications and programs such as The New
York Times, NBC, ABC, CBS, and CNBC.
General Electric owns NBC. Westinghouse own CBS. Disney owns ABC. Oil companies such as Exxon, Texaco, and Mobil -- all with an interest in sustaining economic sanctions to keep Iraqi oil off the market -- have representatives on the corporate boards of these networks, as does Lockheed Martin, which builds the F-22 fighter plane. General Electric and Westinghouse make bomb parts and fighter plane components. That they would consider their corporate profits when deciding how to portray the situation in Iraq is neither surprising nor new. These networks often treat Pentagon and State Department reports and comments as factual, rather than attempting to verify them with UN officials in Iraq.